Pharmacy Pearl 3 september 2003
|
A 23 y/o male aircrew member is deployed to your position in South America on a humanitarian mission. He presents to the clinic with complaints of substernal pain. The tech brings him in hooks him up to an ECG which is normal. He has no significant medical history. His vital signs are normal. The only medication he is on is doxycycline 100mg po BID for malaria prophylaxis. The limited number of labs you have drawn are all within normal limits.
What is your diagnosis? Why or why not?
SELECT here for discussion |
DISCUSSION 3 SEPTEMBER 2003
|
Since you've done a thorough history and physical and all your tests so far are negative, this patient may have pill-induced or drug-induced esophagitis. (FYI - doxycycline is used for malaria prophylaxis in aircrew members instead of mefloquine [Lariam®]. Mefloquine is NOT acceptable for use in aircrew members.) The
esophageal damage can be chemical or mechanical. The drugs
most commonly associated with drug-induced esophagitis
include potassium chloride, NSAIDs, alendronate,
tetracyclines, iron preparations, quinidine (which
probably should never be used in anyone anymore!), and
clindamycin. Patients with neurological swallowing
problems and pre-existing reflux disease may be at greater
risk for problems. To minimize the risk, patient should
take these (and all) medications with at least 3 ounces of
water and From MICROmedex:
PILL-INDUCED ESOPHAGEAL INJURY is now considered to be a
significant cause of esophageal disease and one for which
health professionals should be aware. Usual doses of
capsules or tablets that are inadvertently retained in the
esophagus may result in an inflamed or ulcerated
esophageal mucosa. The DRUGS A
relatively small number of drugs are implicated in a
majority of the reported cases of esophageal injury.
Kikendall et al (1983) extensively reviewed the English
and foreign language literature from 1960 to 1981 and
reported a total of 221 cases caused by 26 different types
of medication (some resulting from combinations). A review
of the English language medical literature since 1981
revealed over 107 additional cases (Maconi & Porro, 1995;
Carlborg et al, 1983; Ginaldi, 1984; Bliss, 1984; Channer
& There are
several reasons why these particular medications cause
esophagitis more frequently than other drugs. Mucosal
damage from NSAIDs may be theresult of reduced protective
mucosal prostaglandin synthesis (Heller et al, 1982). Both
doxycycline and FERROUS SULFATE produce an acidic solution
once PRESENTATION AND COMPLICATIONS Although
many patients note that they initially feel the tablet or
capsule "stuck in their chest," others have no initial
subjective sensation that the pill is retained in the
esophagus. The most common presenting symptoms of
pill-induced esophagitis include odynophagia (painful
swallowing of food), In most of the uncomplicated cases, symptoms resolve within a few days to weeks after discontinuation of the offending drug. However, severe complications such as strictures, bleeding esophageal ulcers and perforation have also been reported and have resulted in several fatalities (Kikendall et al, 1983). These severe complications have only been associated with potassium chloride, iron, quinidine and NSAIDs and not with any of the antibiotics, including the tetracyclines (Kikendall et al, 1983; Spera & Amendola, 1985). RISK FACTORS Patients
with pre-existing esophageal compression or esophageal
reflux may be at a higher risk for pill-induced
esophagitis (Coates et al, 1986). For example, severe
potassium chloride-induced esophageal injury has occurred
most often in patients with esophageal compression due to
cardiomegaly or esophageal entrapment following thoracic
surgery (Kikendall et al, 1983). Nevertheless, many
patients with pill-induced esophagitis have no apparent
esophageal transit abnormality or prior esophageal
disease. The two risk factors implicated most often in
pill-induced esophagitis are taking the pill with little
or no fluid and taking the pill just prior to bedtime.
Recumbency increases esophageal transit time and sleep
further increases transit time by decreasing salivation
and swallowing (Kikendall et al, 1983). Pills that are
swallowed immediately before the patient reclines, or with
little or no fluid, are often retained in the esophagus
for at least 5 to 10 minutes; pills have been retained in
the esophagus for as long as 2 hours (Channer & Virjee,
1982; Hey et al, 1982; Fisher et al, 1982; Evans &
Roberts, 1976). In addition, a recent study demonstrated
rapid esophageal transit when subjects swallowed a capsule
(with water) after drinking as little as 15 mL of water to
lubricate the esophagus, and then followed this Dosage form and formulation factors also affect esophageal retention. It is still not known whether tablets and capsules differ in their ability to "stick" in the esophagus (Fell, 1983). However, doxycycline capsules are more likely to dissolve in the esophagus than doxycycline tablets (Carlborg et al, 1983). In general, oval tablets have faster esophageal transit times than round tablets and small tablets have faster transit times than large tablets (Hey et al, 1982). CONCLUSION: Patients
should be instructed to take tablets or capsules in an
upright or sitting position with at least 100 mL of fluid.
Swallowing the medication after a preliminary sip of fluid
may also be helpful. If possible, "bedtime doses" should
be taken at least ten minutes before actually reclining.
These instructions are especially important for patients
taking oral solid forms of tetracyclines, NSAIDs,
potassium chloride, iron, quinidine and clindamycin, and
for elderly or bedridden patients who may have delayed
esophageal transit times or esophageal compression due to
age or disease. For these patients, a liquid form of
medication may be beneficial. A medication history should
be obtained in any patient with esophagitis or REFERENCES: 1. Amendola
MA & Spera TD: Doxycycline-induced esophagitis. JAMA 1985;
253:1009-1011. This Pearl is meant for academic and educational purposes only. This Pearl is meant to raise important points regarding the safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy of patients. It is not meant to be the definitive reference for the treatment or prophylaxis of various diseases. Although every effort is taken to ensure this Pearl is correct and factual, errors may occur. The Pharmacoeconomic Center assumes no liability for incorrect information or harm that may occur from the use of the information included in this Pearl. |
![]()